Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied. AUTHOR: When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.

Impact of 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria on diagnosis and therapy of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy variants.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are different criteria for the diagnosis of different variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guidelines provide specific clinical criteria for each CIDP variant even if their therapeutical impact has not been investigated. METHODS: We applied the clinical criteria for CIDP variants of the 2021 EAN/PNS guidelines to 369 patients included in the Italian CIDP database who fulfilled the 2021 EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. RESULTS: According to the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria, 245 patients achieved a clinical diagnosis of typical CIDP or CIDP variant (66%). We identified 106 patients with typical CIDP (29%), 62 distal CIDP (17%), 28 multifocal or focal CIDP (7%), four sensory CIDP (1%), 27 sensory-predominant CIDP (7%), 10 motor CIDP (3%), and eight motor-predominant CIDP (2%). Patients with multifocal, distal, and sensory CIDP had milder impairment and symptoms. Patients with multifocal CIDP had less frequently reduced conduction velocity and prolonged F-wave latency and had lower levels of cerebrospinal fluid protein. Patients with distal CIDP more frequently had reduced distal compound muscle action potentials. Patients with motor CIDP did not improve after steroid therapy, whereas those with motor-predominant CIDP did. None of the patients with sensory CIDP responded to steroids, whereas most of those with sensory-predominant CIDP did. CONCLUSIONS: The 2021 EAN/PNS criteria for CIDP allow a better characterization of CIDP variants, permitting their distinction from typical CIDP and more appropriate treatment for patients.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Historical Perspective.

The therapeutic administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers various advantages over intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This narrative review examines and compares SCIg versus IVIg in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). SCIg is as effective as IVIg but is better tolerated and easier to administer, as intravenous access is not required. Furthermore, SCIg administration is more convenient and cost-effective than IVIg, enabling flexible treatment scheduling at home and improving patients' overall quality of life. The availability of highly concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) subcutaneous solutions, such as IgPro20, a 20% IgG solution stabilized with L-proline, allows for the administration of larger volumes in a single session, while the parallel development of new technological devices enables the delivery of higher doses over a shorter time. Based on the results of the PATH study, SCIg has become a well-established therapy in CIDP. In addition to discussing the advantages of SCIg, this review summarizes the evolution of SCIg by discussing all the relevant clinical studies which have considered its use in the treatment of CIDP.

Unclassified clinical presentations of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the ability of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) clinical criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) to include within their classification the whole spectrum of clinical heterogeneity of the disease and to define the clinical characteristics of the unclassifiable clinical forms. METHODS: The 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for CIDP were applied to 329 patients fulfilling the electrodiagnostic (and in some cases also the supportive) criteria for the diagnosis of CIDP. Clinical characteristics were reviewed for each patient not strictly fulfilling the clinical criteria ('unclassifiable'). RESULTS: At study inclusion, 124 (37.5%) patients had an unclassifiable clinical presentation, including 110 (89%) with a typical CIDP-like clinical phenotype in whom some segments of the four limbs were unaffected by weakness ('incomplete typical CIDP'), 10 (8%) with a mild distal, symmetric, sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy confined to the lower limbs with cranial nerve involvement ('cranial nerve predominant CIDP') and 4 (1%) with a symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy limited to the proximal and distal areas of the lower limbs ('paraparetic CIDP'). Eighty-one (65%) patients maintained an unclassifiable presentation during the entire disease follow-up while 13 patients progressed to typical CIDP. Patients with the unclassifiable clinical forms compared with patients with typical CIDP had a milder form of CIDP, while there was no difference in the distribution patterns of demyelination. CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of patients with CIDP do not strictly fulfil the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for diagnosis. These unclassifiable clinical phenotypes may pose diagnostic challenges and thus deserve more attention in clinical practice and research.

Risk of disease relapse, safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the risk of relapse after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and its safety and tolerability, in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies. METHODS: In this multicenter, cohort and case-crossover study, the risk of relapse associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was assessed by comparing the frequency of relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients who underwent or did not undergo vaccination. Frequency of relapse in the 3 months prior to and after vaccination, and safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 336 patients were included (278 CIDP, 58 MMN). Three hundred and seven (91%) patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Twenty-nine patients (9%) did not undergo vaccination. Mild and transient relapses were observed in 16 (5%) patients (13 CIDP, 3 MMN) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and in none of the patients who did not undergo vaccination (relative risk [RR] 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-52.25). There was no increase in the specific risk of relapse associated with type of vaccine or diagnosis. Comparison with the 3-month control period preceding vaccination revealed an increased risk of relapse after vaccination (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.35-11.82), which was restricted to CIDP patients (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.07-9.84). The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate local and systemic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in CIDP and MMN patients does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of relapse at the primary end-point, although a slightly increased risk in CIDP patients was found compared to the 3 months before vaccination.

A diagnostic score for anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein neuropathy or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein antibody.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A diagnostic score was developed to discriminate anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and applied it to patients with atypical anti-MAG neuropathy. METHODS: The clinical and electrophysiological features of patients with a diagnosis of typical anti-MAG neuropathy were compared to those of patients with a diagnosis of CIDP. The association of each feature with the diagnosis was assessed in the two groups. Features showing a significant association with the diagnosis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model and adjusted odds ratios were estimated for each feature. A score ranging from 1 to 3 was applied to each feature based on the magnitude of the estimated odds ratios. The score was then applied to patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIDP who also had high anti-MAG antibody titers (CIDP-MAG). RESULTS: Thirty-one anti-MAG neuropathy patients, 45 typical CIDP patients and 16 CIDP-MAG patients were included. Scores in anti-MAG antibody patients ranged from 1 to 5 and in CIDP patients from -7 to -1. Using the score, 4/16 CIDP-MAG patients were diagnosed to have anti-MAG neuropathy and 12/16 patients to have CIDP. Response to intravenous immunoglobulin in the CIDP-MAG patients classified as CIDP was similar to that of definite CIDP patients and higher than that of anti-MAG neuropathy patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our score allowed an accurate discrimination to be made, amongst patients with anti-MAG antibodies, of those affected by CIDP and the patients with anti-MAG neuropathy. This score may help proper treatment to be chosen for patients with anti-MAG antibodies with a CIDP-like presentation.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the 2021 EAN/PNS and 2010 EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) with those of the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS). METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity of the two sets of criteria were evaluated in 330 patients with CIDP and 166 axonal peripheral neuropathy controls. Comparison of the utility of nerve conduction studies with different number of nerves examined and of the sensitivity and specificity of the two criteria in typical CIDP and its variants were assessed. RESULTS: EFNS/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 92% for possible CIDP and 85% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 83% for possible CIDP and 74% for CIDP. Using supportive criteria, the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS criteria for possible CIDP increased to 85% and that of CIDP to 77%, remaining lower than that of the EFNS/PNS criteria. Specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria was 68% for possible CIDP and 84% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a specificity of 88% for possible CIDP and 98% for CIDP. More extended studies increased the sensitivity of both sets of criteria by 4%-7% but reduced their specificity by 2%-3%. The EFNS/PNS criteria were more sensitive for the diagnosis of typical CIDP while the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific for the diagnosis of distal and sensory CIDP. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific but less sensitive than the EFNS/PNS criteria. With the EAN/PNS criteria, more extended nerve conduction studies are recommended to obtain an acceptable sensitivity while maintaining a high specificity.

Neurophysiological Correlates in Patients with Syringomyelia and Chiari Malformation: The Cortico-Diaphragmatic Involvement.

Purpose. Brainstem syndromes have frequently been reported in Chiari syndrome and in syringobulbia; previous studies have shown that determining the central motor conduction time (CMCT) along the circuit of the phrenic nerve makes the assessment of the voluntary control of the respiratory pathway possible. In our study, we evaluated the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the phrenic nerve in patients affected by Chiari syndrome and/or syringomyelia (Syr) with the aim of identifying subclinical neurophysiological alterations. Methods. One hundred patients (75 females; average age: 51 ± 13.08 SD; range: 18-76) affected by Chiari syndrome and/or Syr without dyspnea were selected. The magnetic stimulation of the second motor neuron correlating with the phrenic nerve was performed using cervical magnetic stimulation (C5-MEP); the cortical MEP after magnetic stimulation (Cz-MEP) was recorded by magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (areas corresponding to the diaphragm). The CMCT was calculated. The differences between the patients and controls were calculated (Student's t test). Results. In 13% of the patients, the Cz-MEP were absent bilaterally, and the CMCT was not evaluable. In all these cases, bulbar/cervical Syr was present at MRI; in 10 of them, this was associated with CM1. A bilateral response was obtained in all the other patients (87%), and the CMCTs were normal. All the patients with alterations/absence of Cz-MEP presented bulbar/cervical Syr at MRI. The C5-MEP latency was prolonged or absent in 48%; of these, 84% presented bulbar/cervical Syr associated with CM1 at MRI. The C5-MEP latency values were significantly higher in the group of patients. Conclusions. Neurophysiological alterations of the diaphragmatic pathway were recorded in a group of Chiari syndrome and, particularly, in bulbar/cervical Syr. Future studies with larger cohorts of patients are needed to further assess the specific role of the TMS of the phrenic nerve in CM/Syr patients.

Motor Nerve Conduction Block Estimation in Demyelinating Neuropathies by Deconvolution.

A deconvolution method is proposed for conduction block (CB) estimation based on two compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) elicited by stimulating a nerve proximal and distal to the region in which the block is suspected. It estimates the time delay distributions by CMAPs deconvolution, from which CB is computed. The slow afterwave (SAW) is included to describe the motor unit potential, as it gives an important contribution in case of the large temporal dispersion (TD) often found in patients. The method is tested on experimental signals obtained from both healthy subjects and pathological patients, with either Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) or Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN). The new technique outperforms the clinical methods (based on amplitude and area of CMAPs) and a previous state-of-the-art deconvolution approach. It compensates phase cancellations, allowing to discriminate among CB and TD: estimated by the methods of amplitude, area and deconvolution, CB showed a correlation with TD equal to 39.3%, 29.5% and 8.2%, respectively. Moreover, a significant decrease of percentage reconstruction errors of the CMAPs with respect to the previous deconvolution approach is obtained (from a mean/median of 19.1%/16.7% to 11.7%/11.2%). Therefore, the new method is able to discriminate between CB and TD (overcoming the important limitation of clinical approaches) and can approximate patients' CMAPs better than the previous deconvolution algorithm. Then, it appears to be promising for the diagnosis of demyelinating polyneuropathies, to be further tested in the future in a prospective clinical trial.

Frequency and clinical correlates of anti-nerve antibodies in a large population of CIDP patients included in the Italian database.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and clinical correlates of anti-nerve autoantibodies in an unselected series of Italian patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) METHODS: Sera from 276 CIDP patients fulfilling the EFNS/PNS criteria and included in the Italian CIDP database were examined for the presence of anti-nerve autoantibodies. Results were correlated with the clinical data collected in the database. RESULTS: Anti-neurofascin155 (NF155) antibodies were found in 9/258 (3.5%) patients, anti-contactin1 (CNTN1) antibodies in 4/258 (1.6%) patients, and anti-contactin-associated protein1 (Caspr1) in 1/197 (0.5%) patients, while none had reactivity to gliomedin or neurofascin 186. Predominance of IgG4 isotype was present in 7of the 9 examined patients. Anti-NF155 patients more frequently had ataxia, tremor, and higher CSF protein levels than antibody-negative patients. Anti-CNTN1 patients more frequently had a GBS-like onset, pain, and ataxia and had more severe motor impairment at enrollment than antibody-negative patients. They more frequently received plasmapheresis, possibly reflecting a less satisfactory response to IVIg or steroids. IgM antibodies against one or more gangliosides were found in 6.5% of the patients (17/260) and were more frequently directed against GM1 (3.9%). They were frequently associated with a progressive course, with a multifocal sensorimotor phenotype and less frequent cranial nerve involvement and ataxia. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-paranodal and anti-ganglioside antibodies are infrequent in patients with CIDP but are associated with some typical clinical association supporting the hypothesis that CIDP might be a pathogenically heterogeneous syndrome possibly explaining the different clinical presentations.

Update on therapy of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies.

Chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), are a group of disorders deemed to be caused by an immune response against peripheral nerve antigens. Several immune therapies have been reported to be variably effective in these neuropathies including steroids, plasma exchange, and high-dose intravenous (IVIg) or subcutaneous (SCIg) immunoglobulins. These therapies are however far from being invariably effective and may be associated with a number of side effects leading to the use of immunosuppressive agents whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in randomized trials. More recently, new biological agents, such as rituximab, have proved to be effective in patients with neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and are currently tested in CIDP.

The neurophysiological lesson from the Italian CIDP database.

INTRODUCTION: Electrophysiological diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may be challenging. Thus, with the aim ofproviding some practical advice in electrophysiological approach to a patient with suspected CIDP, we analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients enrolled inthe Italian CIDP Database. METHODS: We calculated the rate of each demyelinating feature, the rate of demyelinating features per nerve, the diagnostic rate for upper andlower limb nerves, and, using a ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of each couple of nerves and each demyelinating feature, for every CIDP subtype.Moreover, we compared the electrophysiological data of definite and probable CIDP patients with those of possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, and by a logisticregression analysis, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) to make an electrophysiological diagnosis of definite or probable CIDP. RESULTS: The ulnar nerve had the highestrate of demyelinating features and, when tested bilaterally, had the highest diagnostic accuracy except for DADS in which peroneal nerves were the most informative.In possible and not-fulfilling CIDP patients, a lower number of nerves and proximal temporal dispersion (TD) measurements had been performed compared to definiteand probable CIDP patients. Importantly, OR for each tested motor nerve and each TD measurement was 1.59 and 1.33, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findingsdemonstrated that the diagnosis of CIDP may be missed due to inadequate or incomplete electrophysiological examination or interpretation. At the same time, thesedata taken together could be useful to draw a thoughtful electrophysiological approach to patients suspected of CIDP.

Migraine in Chiari 1 Malformation: a cross-sectional, single centre study.

In Chiari 1 Malformation (CM1) the most frequent symptom is exertional headache, but other headache types have been reported, such as migraine. This cross-sectional study is aimed to examine the prevalence of migraine in a group of CM1 headache patients and to compare clinical-demographic characteristics between migraine and non-migraine patients. 427 adults were enrolled at the multidisciplinary Chiari Center in Torino. 230 headache patients were classified, based on radiological criteria. Frequencies (absolute/percentage values) were calculated in the whole sample for: migraine presence (with and without aura), gender, age, radiologic phenotypes and headache clinical characteristics. The association between CM1 diagnosis and headache characteristics (independent variables) and migraine diagnosis (dependent variable) was estimated by logistic regression models. Seventy-eight patients (67 females) out of 230 presenting headache had a migraine (34%), 44/78 (56%) with aura; in 58/78 (74%) migraine was comorbid with secondary headache attributable to CM1. Migraine prevalence in patients with isolated CM1 (52/120, 43.3%) was higher (p = 0.0016) than in all the other patients (26/110, 23.6%). Although migraine was prevalent in females (86%; 6:1 female:male ratio), age classes and gender were not risk factors for migraine at multivariate analysis, while migraine was associated with isolated CM1 phenotype (OR = 2.6). This study shows a high prevalence of migraine in CM1 patients and a significant association between migraine and isolated CM1. In patients with radiological evidence of CM1, particularly in the absence of neurological signs, a careful headache clinical characterization, according to the International Headache Society criteria, may be advised.

Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation and syringomyelia in adults: international consensus document.

BACKGROUND: Syringomyelia and Chiari malformation are classified as rare diseases on Orphanet, but international guidelines on diagnostic criteria and case definition are missing. AIM OF THE STUDY: to reach a consensus among international experts on controversial issues in diagnosis and treatment of Chiari 1 malformation and syringomyelia in adults. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of the Chiari and Syringomyelia Consortium (4 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 neuroradiologist, 1 pediatric neurologist) appointed an international Jury of experts to elaborate a consensus document. After an evidence-based review and further discussions, 63 draft statements grouped in 4 domains (definition and classification/planning/surgery/isolated syringomyelia) were formulated. A Jury of 32 experts in the field of diagnosis and treatment of Chiari and syringomyelia and patient representatives were invited to take part in a three-round Delphi process. The Jury received a structured questionnaire containing the 63 statements, each to be voted on a 4-point Likert-type scale and commented. Statements with agreement <75% were revised and entered round 2. Round 3 was face-to-face, during the Chiari Consensus Conference (Milan, November 2019). RESULTS: Thirty-one out of 32 Jury members (6 neurologists, 4 neuroradiologists, 19 neurosurgeons, and 2 patient association representatives) participated in the consensus. After round 2, a consensus was reached on 57/63 statements (90.5%). The six difficult statements were revised and voted in round 3, and the whole set of statements was further discussed and approved. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus document consists of 63 statements which benefited from expert discussion and fine-tuning, serving clinicians and researchers following adults with Chiari and syringomyelia.

Prolonged distal motor latency of median nerve does not improve diagnostic accuracy for CIDP.

Compression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel can give demyelinating features and result in distal motor latency (DML) prolongation fulfilling the EFNS/PNS demyelinating criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Accordingly, being carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) common in the general population, the EFNS/PNS guidelines recommend excluding the DML of the median nerve when DML prolongation may be consistent with median neuropathy at the wrist from CTS. The main aims of this study were to verify whether the inclusion of DML of the median nerve (when consistent with CTS) could improve electrophysiological diagnostic accuracy for CIDP and if the median nerve at the carpal tunnel was more prone to demyelination. We analyzed electrophysiological data from 499 patients included consecutively into the Italian CIDP Database. According to the EFNS/PNS criteria, 352 patients had a definite, 10 a probable, and 57 a possible diagnosis of CIDP, while 80 were not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria. The inclusion of DML prolongation of median nerve did not improve significantly the diagnostic accuracy for CIDP; overall diagnostic class changed in 6 out of 499 patients (1.2%) and electrodiagnostic class of CIDP changed from not fulfilling to possible in only 2 patients (2.5% of not-fulfilling patients). In conclusion, we can infer that excluding DML prolongation of median nerve does not increase the risk of missing a diagnosis of CIDP thus corroborating the current EFNS/PNS criteria.

Peripheral neuropathy after viral eradication with direct-acting antivirals in chronic HCV hepatitis: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: HCV-related extra-hepatic complications include peripheral neuropathies, with important prevalence and impact. A recent metanalysis of previous intervention trials concluded for insufficient data to support evidence-based treatments for this complication. In this longitudinal study, we assessed for the first time prevalence and outcome of neuropathy in a cohort of patients with chronic HCV, before and after direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment. METHOD: Ninety-four patients (mean age 58.5 ± 9.9, infection duration 22.2 ± 6.3 years) without systemic and metabolic diseases, underwent neurological examination and electroneurography studies before (T0) and 10.4 ± 1.7 months after the end of DAA therapy (T1), and cryoglobulins (CG) assessment. Muscle strength was evaluated by Medical Research Council (MRC) score; neuropathic pain, sensory function, disability, quality of life were assessed by validated questionnaires (DN4, NPSI, SSS, INCAT and Euro-QoL). RESULTS: At T0, sensory-motor neuropathy was detected in 22 patients (23%), reflexes were depressed in 32 (34%) with no association with infection duration, viral load, age, CG. Neuropathic pain (DN4 ≥4) was present in 37 patients (39%). At T1, out of the 22 patients with altered electroneurography, 3 had died or developed HCC, 4 showed normal electroneurography, and nerve amplitude parameters tended to improve in the whole group. Only 11 patients (12%) had depressed reflexes and 10 (11%) DN4 ≥4 (P < .05 compared to T0). Scores for MRC, questionnaires and Euro-QoL improved significantly (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the high prevalence of clinical and subclinical peripheral sensory-motor neuropathy in patients with HCV infection and indicates improvement after eradication by DAA. These results support the need for larger intervention studies.

Manual push technique, an alternative route of subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) administered through infusion pump has been reported as effective in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients. In this study we evaluate an alternative technique of SCIg administration, based on the delivery of lower volumes administered daily using manual push technique (MPT) in 10 CIDP patients. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, two-arm, crossover clinical trial, CIDP patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive SCIg either by MPT or pumps for 4 consecutive months with crossover to the other. The primary objective was to assess whether MPT had the same effectiveness as pumps. The secondary objectives were to assess whether MPT resulted in greater plasma IgG levels and improved quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age = 48.3) were enrolled. No significant changes were observed in the efficacy parameters (INCAT, MRC, R-ODS, and GS scales). A positive mean variation of 5.4 % in plasma IgG levels in the group treated with MPT was observed at the end of MPT periods. Treatment interference, which is one of the dimensions of the Life Quality Index, showed a significant improvement in the MPT periods. CONCLUSION: In CIDP patients, the MPT technique was as effective as pump infusion, allowed comparable, slightly increases plasma IgG levels, and also improved the QoL.